EPYC 7413 vs EPYC 7502P

EPYC 7413 vs EPYC 7502P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7413

24 / 48

50,641

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

EPYC 7502P

32 / 64

51,206

+1.1%

Ryzen 7 7840HS

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7413 vs EPYC 7502P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7413 vs EPYC 7502P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7413

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $475 less on MSRP ($1,825 MSRP vs $2,300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 24.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.7 vs 22.3 PassMark/$ ($1,825 MSRP vs $2,300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7502P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (50,641 vs 51,206).

EPYC 7502P

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.3 vs 27.7 PassMark/$ ($2,300 MSRP vs $1,825 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7502P better than EPYC 7413?

Yes. EPYC 7502P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7502P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7502P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7502P is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7413 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 7502P comes in 26.0% more expensive on MSRP at $2,300 MSRP versus $1,825 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7413 is also 24.6% better value on MSRP (27.7 vs 22.3 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7413 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019). That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 7413 vs EPYC 7502P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7413

The EPYC 7413 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.65 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 50,641 points. Launch price was $1,825.

EPYC 7502P

The EPYC 7502P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 51,206 points. Launch price was $2,300.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7413 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 7502P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7502P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the EPYC 7413 versus 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7502P — a 7.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 7413 (base: 2.65 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7413 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 7502P uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7413 scores 50,641 against the EPYC 7502P's 51,206 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 7502P. Both processors carry 128 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	EPYC 7413	EPYC 7502P
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+7%	3.35 GHz
Base Clock	2.65 GHz+6%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)	128 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm+	7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark	50,641	51,206+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7413 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7502P uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7413) and SP3 (EPYC 7502P).

Feature	EPYC 7413	EPYC 7502P
Socket	SP3	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7413 rivals Xeon Gold 6338; EPYC 7502P rivals Xeon Gold 6338.

Feature	EPYC 7413	EPYC 7502P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7413 was priced at $1825, while the EPYC 7502P came in at $2300. On launch pricing ($1825 vs $2300), EPYC 7413 was $475 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7413 delivers 27.7 pts/$ vs 22.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 7502P — making the EPYC 7413 the 21.9% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7413	EPYC 7502P
MSRP	$1825-21%	$2300
Performance per Dollar	27.7+24%	22.3
Release Date	2021	2019

Search EPYC 7413 on Amazon

Search EPYC 7502P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.