EPYC 7413 vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7413

24 Cores48 Thrd180 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2021

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

32 Cores64 Thrd300 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2023

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7413 vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7413

24 / 48

50,641

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

32 / 64

50,189

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7413 vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7413 vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7413

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 60 MB).
✅Costs $4,120 less on MSRP ($1,825 MSRP vs $5,945 MSRP).
✅Delivers 228.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.7 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($1,825 MSRP vs $5,945 MSRP).
✅Draws 180W instead of 300W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (50,189 vs 50,641).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (60 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 27.7 PassMark/$ ($5,945 MSRP vs $1,825 MSRP).
❌66.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 180W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7413 better than Xeon Platinum 8562Y+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is ahead with a 6.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7413 pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark. EPYC 7413 also has the bigger cache pool with 113.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 60 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7413 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 113.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 60 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7413 is the better buy right now. EPYC 7413 comes in $4,120 cheaper on MSRP at $1,825 MSRP versus $5,945 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 228.7% better value on MSRP (27.7 vs 8.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of SP3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 7413 vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7413

The EPYC 7413 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.65 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 50,641 points. Launch price was $1,825.

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

The Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,189 points. Launch price was $5,945.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7413 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the EPYC 7413 versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — a 13% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ (base: 2.65 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 7413 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7413 scores 50,641 against the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+'s 50,189 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 7413. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7413 vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+.

Feature	EPYC 7413	Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	4.1 GHz+14%
Base Clock	2.65 GHz	2.8 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+113%	60 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm+-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	50,641	50,189

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7413 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7413 versus 5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7413) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+) — the EPYC 7413 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7413) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+).

Feature	EPYC 7413	Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
Socket	SP3	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200	5600+75%
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7413 rivals Xeon Gold 6338; Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ rivals EPYC 9474F.

Feature	EPYC 7413	Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7413 was priced at $1825, while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ came in at $5945. On launch pricing ($1825 vs $5945), EPYC 7413 was $4120 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7413 delivers 27.7 pts/$ vs 8.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — making the EPYC 7413 the 106.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7413	Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
MSRP	$1825-69%	$5945
Performance per Dollar	27.7+230%	8.4
Release Date	2021	2023

Search EPYC 7413 on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.