
Xeon 6740P
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8592+
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon 6740P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+7.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $6,950 less on MSRP ($4,650 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 169.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.5 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($4,650 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 270W instead of 350W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Platinum 8592+
2023Why buy it
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (84,013 vs 90,684).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($11,600 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).
- ❌29.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 270W.
Xeon 6740P
2025Xeon Platinum 8592+
2023Why buy it
- ✅+7.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $6,950 less on MSRP ($4,650 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 169.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.5 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($4,650 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 270W instead of 350W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (84,013 vs 90,684).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($11,600 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).
- ❌29.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 270W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6740P better than Xeon Platinum 8592+?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon 6740P | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon 6740P | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 252 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 141 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon 6740P | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 849 FPS | 849 FPS |
| medium | 768 FPS | 768 FPS |
| high | 730 FPS | 730 FPS |
| ultra | 641 FPS | 641 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 737 FPS | 737 FPS |
| medium | 662 FPS | 662 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 558 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 364 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon 6740P | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1097 FPS | 938 FPS |
| medium | 978 FPS | 849 FPS |
| high | 834 FPS | 732 FPS |
| ultra | 702 FPS | 633 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 902 FPS | 776 FPS |
| medium | 777 FPS | 677 FPS |
| high | 660 FPS | 581 FPS |
| ultra | 551 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 656 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 577 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 505 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 383 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6740P and Xeon Platinum 8592+

Xeon 6740P
Xeon 6740P
The Xeon 6740P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 90,684 points. Launch price was $4,650.

Xeon Platinum 8592+
Xeon Platinum 8592+
The Xeon Platinum 8592+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 320 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,013 points. Launch price was $11,600.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6740P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8592+ has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6740P versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8592+ (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Xeon 6740P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6740P scores 90,684 against the Xeon Platinum 8592+'s 84,013 — a 7.6% lead for the Xeon 6740P. L3 cache: 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6740P vs 320 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8592+.
| Feature | Xeon 6740P | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96 | 64 / 128+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.9 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz+11% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 288 MB (total) | 320 MB (total)+11% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-70% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 90,684+8% | 84,013 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6740P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6740P versus 5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — the Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 4 TB — 199.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6740P) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8592+) — the Xeon 6740P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Xeon 6740P | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | 5600+111900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 TB+104857500% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 88+10% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6740P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8592+). Primary use case: Xeon 6740P targets High-density Compute. Direct competitor: Xeon 6740P rivals EPYC 9355P; Xeon Platinum 8592+ rivals EPYC 9554.
| Feature | Xeon 6740P | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-density Compute | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon 6740P launched at $4650 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ debuted at $11600. On MSRP ($4650 vs $11600), the Xeon 6740P is $6950 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6740P delivers 19.5 pts/$ vs 7.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — making the Xeon 6740P the 91.7% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6740P | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4650-60% | $11600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.5+171% | 7.2 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













