EPYC 9375F vs Xeon 6740P

EPYC 9375F vs Xeon 6740P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9375F

32 / 64

95,768

+5.6%

Ryzen 9 7940HX

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Xeon 6740P

48 / 96

90,684

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9375F vs Xeon 6740P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9375F vs Xeon 6740P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9375F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($5,306 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).
❌18.5% higher power demand at 320W vs 270W.

Xeon 6740P

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $656 less on MSRP ($4,650 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
✅Delivers 8.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.5 vs 18.0 PassMark/$ ($4,650 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).
✅Draws 270W instead of 320W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9375F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (90,684 vs 95,768).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9375F better than Xeon 6740P?

Yes. EPYC 9375F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 25.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 5.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9375F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 25.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9375F is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.6% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9375F is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon 6740P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 9375F comes in 14.1% more expensive on MSRP at $5,306 MSRP versus $4,650 MSRP, and it still gives you a 25.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon 6740P is also 8.0% better value on MSRP (19.5 vs 18.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6740P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024). That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 9375F vs Xeon 6740P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9375F

The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.

Xeon 6740P

The Xeon 6740P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 90,684 points. Launch price was $4,650.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9375F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon 6740P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6740P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6740P — a 23.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9375F (base: 3.85 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 9375F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6740P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9375F scores 95,768 against the Xeon 6740P's 90,684 — a 5.5% lead for the EPYC 9375F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9375F vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6740P.

Feature	EPYC 9375F	Xeon 6740P
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	48 / 96+50%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+26%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.85 GHz+83%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	288 MB (total)+13%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm	Intel 3 nm-25%
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	95,768+6%	90,684
Geekbench 6 Single	2,981	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	26,020	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9375F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6740P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9375F versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6740P — the Xeon 6740P supports 6.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9375F supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9375F) vs 8 (Xeon 6740P). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9375F) vs 88 (Xeon 6740P) — the EPYC 9375F offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	EPYC 9375F	Xeon 6740P
Socket	SP5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-6400+7%
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+50%	4 TB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+45%	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9375F) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6740P). Primary use case: EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized, Xeon 6740P targets High-density Compute. Direct competitor: EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E; Xeon 6740P rivals EPYC 9355P.

Feature	EPYC 9375F	Xeon 6740P
Integrated GPU	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT
Target Use	Data Center / Frequency Optimized	High-density Compute

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9375F was priced at $5306, while the Xeon 6740P came in at $4650. On launch pricing ($5306 vs $4650), Xeon 6740P was $656 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9375F delivers 18.0 pts/$ vs 19.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 6740P — making the Xeon 6740P the 7.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9375F	Xeon 6740P
MSRP	$5306	$4650-12%
Performance per Dollar	18.0	19.5+8%
Release Date	2024	2025

Search EPYC 9375F on Amazon

Search Xeon 6740P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.