Xeon Bronze 3104 vs Core i7-2820QM
Xeon Bronze 3104
Core i7-2820QM
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon Bronze 3104 is positioned at rank 598 and the Core i7-2820QM is on rank 1138, so the Xeon Bronze 3104 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Bronze 3104
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2820QM
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon Bronze 3104 | Core i7-2820QM |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($568) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Skylake (server) (2017−2018) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon Bronze 3104 | Core i7-2820QM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($568) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Bronze 3104 and Core i7-2820QM
Xeon Bronze 3104
The Xeon Bronze 3104 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $213.
Core i7-2820QM
The Core i7-2820QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,379 points. Launch price was $568.
Processing Power
The Xeon Bronze 3104 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Core i7-2820QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon Bronze 3104 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Bronze 3104 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-2820QM — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-2820QM (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon Bronze 3104 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-2820QM uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Bronze 3104 scores 4,383 against the Core i7-2820QM's 4,379 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Bronze 3104. L3 cache: 8.25 MB on the Xeon Bronze 3104 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-2820QM.
| Feature | Xeon Bronze 3104 | Core i7-2820QM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 1.7 GHz | 3.4 GHz+100% |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 2.3 GHz+35% |
| L3 Cache | 8.25 MB+3% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+2300% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 4,383 | 4,379 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 554 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,763 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Bronze 3104 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2820QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the Xeon Bronze 3104 versus 1600 on the Core i7-2820QM — the Xeon Bronze 3104 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Bronze 3104 supports up to 768 of RAM compared to 32 — 184% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Bronze 3104) vs 2 (Core i7-2820QM). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Bronze 3104) vs 16 (Core i7-2820QM) — the Xeon Bronze 3104 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Bronze 3104) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i7-2820QM).
| Feature | Xeon Bronze 3104 | Core i7-2820QM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2133+33% | 1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 768+2300% | 32 |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 48+200% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Bronze 3104 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Bronze 3104) vs true (Core i7-2820QM). The Core i7-2820QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Xeon Bronze 3104 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-2820QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.
| Feature | Xeon Bronze 3104 | Core i7-2820QM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon Bronze 3104 and Core i7-2820QM
