Xeon Bronze 3104 vs Xeon L5639

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Bronze 3104 vs Xeon L5639 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Bronze 3104 vs Xeon L5639: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Bronze 3104

2017

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon L5639 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,383 vs 4,419).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 12 MB).
❌41.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 60W.

Xeon L5639

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8.3 MB).
✅Draws 60W instead of 85W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon L5639 better than Xeon Bronze 3104?

Yes. Xeon L5639 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon L5639 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon L5639 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 45.5% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8.3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon L5639 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon L5639 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Bronze 3104 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2011) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon Bronze 3104 vs Xeon L5639 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Bronze 3104

The Xeon Bronze 3104 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $213.

Xeon L5639

The Xeon L5639 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.133 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,419 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Bronze 3104 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, matching the Xeon L5639's 6 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Bronze 3104 versus 2.67 GHz on the Xeon L5639 — a 44.4% clock advantage for the Xeon L5639 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.133 GHz). The Xeon Bronze 3104 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon L5639 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Bronze 3104 scores 4,383 against the Xeon L5639's 4,419 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon L5639. L3 cache: 8.25 MB on the Xeon Bronze 3104 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon L5639.

Feature	Xeon Bronze 3104	Xeon L5639
Cores / Threads	6 / 6	6 / 12
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz	2.67 GHz+57%
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	2.133 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	8.25 MB	12 MB (total)+45%
L2 Cache	6 MB+2300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	4,383	4,419

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Bronze 3104 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon L5639 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.