
Athlon 220GE

Xeon Bronze 3104
Athlon 220GE vs Xeon Bronze 3104 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 220GE vs Xeon Bronze 3104 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 220GE vs Xeon Bronze 3104: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 220GE
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 85W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 3, while Xeon Bronze 3104 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8.3 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Bronze 3104, which brings 6 cores / 6 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $65 MSRP, while Xeon Bronze 3104 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Bronze 3104
2017Why buy it
- ✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (8.3 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 6 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 8.
- ✅500% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,383 vs 4,441).
- ❌142.9% higher power demand at 85W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon 220GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon 220GE better than Xeon Bronze 3104?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 220GE vs Xeon Bronze 3104 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 220GE
The Athlon 220GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,441 points. Launch price was $65.

Xeon Bronze 3104
The Xeon Bronze 3104 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $213.
Processing Power
The Athlon 220GE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon Bronze 3104 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Xeon Bronze 3104 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Athlon 220GE versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Bronze 3104 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Athlon 220GE (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Athlon 220GE uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Bronze 3104 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 220GE scores 4,441 against the Xeon Bronze 3104's 4,383 — a 1.3% lead for the Athlon 220GE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon 220GE vs 8.25 MB on the Xeon Bronze 3104.
| Feature | Athlon 220GE | Xeon Bronze 3104 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 6 / 6+200% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+100% | 1.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+100% | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8.25 MB+106% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+8433% | 6 MB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 4,441+1% | 4,383 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 886 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,023 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 220GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Bronze 3104 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2667 on the Athlon 220GE versus 2133 on the Xeon Bronze 3104 — the Athlon 220GE supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Bronze 3104 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon 220GE) vs 6 (Xeon Bronze 3104). PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon 220GE) vs 48 (Xeon Bronze 3104) — the Xeon Bronze 3104 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470 (Athlon 220GE) and C621 (Xeon Bronze 3104).
| Feature | Athlon 220GE | Xeon Bronze 3104 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2667+25% | 2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 768 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 48+500% |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon 220GE has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Bronze 3104 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon 220GE) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Bronze 3104). The Athlon 220GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3), while the Xeon Bronze 3104 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 220GE targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon 220GE rivals Pentium Gold G5400.
| Feature | Athlon 220GE | Xeon Bronze 3104 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 3 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















