
Athlon 220GE

Celeron G6900
Athlon 220GE vs Celeron G6900 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 220GE vs Celeron G6900 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone
Athlon 220GE vs Celeron G6900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 220GE
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 46W, a 11W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (886 vs 1,563).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,023 vs 2,631).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.3 vs 85.7 PassMark/$ ($65 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Celeron G6900 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Celeron G6900
2022Why buy it
- ✅+76.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $13 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $65 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 85.7 vs 68.3 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $65 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌31.4% higher power demand at 46W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G6900 better than Athlon 220GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 220GE vs Celeron G6900 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 220GE
The Athlon 220GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,441 points. Launch price was $65.

Celeron G6900
The Celeron G6900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 4,458 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon 220GE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G6900's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Athlon 220GE versus 3.4 GHz on the Celeron G6900 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Athlon 220GE uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron G6900 uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 220GE scores 4,441 against the Celeron G6900's 4,458 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G6900. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 886 vs 1,563, a 55.3% lead for the Celeron G6900 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,023 vs 2,631 (26.1% advantage for the Celeron G6900). Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon 220GE | Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+40860% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 4,441 | 4,458 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 886 | 1,563+76% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,023 | 2,631+30% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 220GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G6900 uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2667 on the Athlon 220GE versus DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900 — the Celeron G6900 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G6900 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon 220GE) vs 20 (Celeron G6900) — the Celeron G6900 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470 (Athlon 220GE) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Celeron G6900).
| Feature | Athlon 220GE | Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2667 | DDR5-4800+80% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 20+150% |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon 220GE has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon 220GE) vs VT-x (Celeron G6900). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Vega 3 (Athlon 220GE) and UHD Graphics 710 (Celeron G6900) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 220GE targets Desktop, Celeron G6900 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon 220GE rivals Pentium Gold G5400; Celeron G6900 rivals Pentium Gold G7400.
| Feature | Athlon 220GE | Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 3 | UHD Graphics 710 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Desktop | Budget |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon 220GE was priced at $65, while the Celeron G6900 came in at $52. On launch pricing ($65 vs $52), Celeron G6900 was $13 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 220GE delivers 68.3 pts/$ vs 85.7 pts/$ for the Celeron G6900 — making the Celeron G6900 the 22.6% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 220GE | Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $65 | $52-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.3 | 85.7+25% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















