
Athlon 220GE

Core i3-7101E
Athlon 220GE vs Core i3-7101E Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 220GE vs Core i3-7101E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone
Athlon 220GE vs Core i3-7101E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 220GE
2018Why buy it
- β +0.2% higher PassMark.
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
- β Costs $52 less on MSRP ($65 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
- β Delivers 80.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.3 vs 37.9 PassMark/$ ($65 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).
- β Draws 35W instead of 54W, a 19W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-7101E across 30 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Core i3-7101E
2017Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 30 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (4,430 vs 4,441).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 37.9 vs 68.3 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $65 MSRP).
- β54.3% higher power demand at 54W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon 220GE better than Core i3-7101E?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 220GE vs Core i3-7101E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 220GE
The Athlon 220GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017β2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,441 points. Launch price was $65.

Core i3-7101E
The Core i3-7101E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016β2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,430 points. Launch price was $117.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 220GE and Core i3-7101E share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Athlon 220GE versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-7101E β a 13.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-7101E (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Athlon 220GE uses the Zen (2017β2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-7101E uses Kaby Lake (2016β2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 220GE scores 4,441 against the Core i3-7101E's 4,430 β a 0.2% lead for the Athlon 220GE. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 886 vs 1,250, a 34.1% lead for the Core i3-7101E that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon 220GE vs 3 MB on the Core i3-7101E.
| Feature | Athlon 220GE | Core i3-7101E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.9 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.9 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total)+33% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017β2020) | Kaby Lake (2016β2019) |
| PassMark | 4,441 | 4,430 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 886 | 1,250+41% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,023 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 220GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-7101E uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2667 on the Athlon 220GE versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7101E β the Athlon 220GE supports 11.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon 220GE) vs 16 (Core i3-7101E) β the Core i3-7101E offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470 (Athlon 220GE) and C236,C232,Q170,Q270 (Core i3-7101E).
| Feature | Athlon 220GE | Core i3-7101E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2667+11% | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon 220GE has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon 220GE) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7101E). Both include integrated graphics β Radeon Vega 3 (Athlon 220GE) and HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7101E) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 220GE targets Desktop, Core i3-7101E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Athlon 220GE rivals Pentium Gold G5400; Core i3-7101E rivals Embedded Ryzen V1000.
| Feature | Athlon 220GE | Core i3-7101E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 3 | HD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Desktop | Embedded |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon 220GE was priced at $65, while the Core i3-7101E came in at $117. On launch pricing ($65 vs $117), Athlon 220GE was $52 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 220GE delivers 68.3 pts/$ vs 37.9 pts/$ for the Core i3-7101E β making the Athlon 220GE the 57.4% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 220GE | Core i3-7101E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $65-44% | $117 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.3+80% | 37.9 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















