
Athlon 220GE

Xeon E5-1603 v3
Athlon 220GE vs Xeon E5-1603 v3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 220GE vs Xeon E5-1603 v3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone

Dota 2

Euro Truck Simulator 2

Final Fantasy XIV
Athlon 220GE vs Xeon E5-1603 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 220GE
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $208 less on MSRP ($65 MSRP vs $273 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 318.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.3 vs 16.3 PassMark/$ ($65 MSRP vs $273 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 140W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 3, while Xeon E5-1603 v3 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1603 v3 across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,441 vs 4,460).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 10 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1603 v3, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
Xeon E5-1603 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 68.3 PassMark/$ ($273 MSRP vs $65 MSRP).
- ❌300% higher power demand at 140W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon 220GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-1603 v3 better than Athlon 220GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 220GE vs Xeon E5-1603 v3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 220GE
The Athlon 220GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,441 points. Launch price was $65.

Xeon E5-1603 v3
The Xeon E5-1603 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 4,460 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Athlon 220GE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-1603 v3 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-1603 v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Athlon 220GE versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-1603 v3 — a 19.4% clock advantage for the Athlon 220GE (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Athlon 220GE uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-1603 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 220GE scores 4,441 against the Xeon E5-1603 v3's 4,460 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-1603 v3. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon 220GE vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1603 v3.
| Feature | Athlon 220GE | Xeon E5-1603 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+21% | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+21% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 10 MB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 4,441 | 4,460 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 886 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,023 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 220GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1603 v3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon 220GE | Xeon E5-1603 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011-3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2667 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon 220GE) / not specified (Xeon E5-1603 v3). The Athlon 220GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3), while the Xeon E5-1603 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 220GE targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon 220GE rivals Pentium Gold G5400.
| Feature | Athlon 220GE | Xeon E5-1603 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 3 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon 220GE was priced at $65, while the Xeon E5-1603 v3 came in at $273. On launch pricing ($65 vs $273), Athlon 220GE was $208 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 220GE delivers 68.3 pts/$ vs 16.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1603 v3 — making the Athlon 220GE the 122.8% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 220GE | Xeon E5-1603 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $65-76% | $273 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.3+319% | 16.3 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















