FX-6330 vs Xeon Bronze 3104

FX-6330 vs Xeon Bronze 3104 Performance Spectrum

FX-6330

6 / 6

4,433

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon Bronze 3104

6 / 6

4,383

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-6330 vs Xeon Bronze 3104 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-6330 vs Xeon Bronze 3104: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-6330

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Bronze 3104, which brings 6 cores / 6 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $109 MSRP, while Xeon Bronze 3104 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌47.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 85W.

Xeon Bronze 3104

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 6 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅Draws 85W instead of 125W, a 40W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-6330 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,383 vs 4,433).

Quick Answers

So, is FX-6330 better than Xeon Bronze 3104?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Bronze 3104 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-6330 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-6330 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-6330 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-6330 is the better buy right now. FX-6330 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $109 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (40.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Bronze 3104 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

FX-6330 vs Xeon Bronze 3104 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-6330

The FX-6330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 December 2015 (9 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,433 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon Bronze 3104

The Xeon Bronze 3104 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $213.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the FX-6330 and Xeon Bronze 3104 share an identical 6-core/6-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the FX-6330 versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Bronze 3104 — a 84.7% clock advantage for the FX-6330 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The FX-6330 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon Bronze 3104 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the FX-6330 scores 4,433 against the Xeon Bronze 3104's 4,383 — a 1.1% lead for the FX-6330. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the FX-6330 vs 8.25 MB on the Xeon Bronze 3104.

Feature	FX-6330	Xeon Bronze 3104
Cores / Threads	6 / 6	6 / 6
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+147%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+112%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8.25 MB+3%
L2 Cache	6 MB	6 MB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Vishera (2012−2015)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	4,433+1%	4,383

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-6330 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon Bronze 3104 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.