FX-6330
VS
Xeon X5647

FX-6330 vs Xeon X5647

AMD

FX-6330

6 Cores6 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Xeon X5647

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-6330 is positioned at rank 494 and the Xeon X5647 is on rank 593, so the FX-6330 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-6330

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7664%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7242%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5258%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1584%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1255%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1098%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
629%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
621%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
565%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
565%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
559%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
544%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
536%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
534%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
529%
#256
Ryzen 7 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
96%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
96%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
96%
#494
FX-6330
MSRP: $109|Avg: $25
100%
#495
Celeron G1630
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
100%
#499
Pentium G4400
MSRP: $64|Avg: $85
98%
#501
Core i5-8600K
MSRP: $257|Avg: $100
97%
#506
Athlon II X4 651
MSRP: $92|Avg: $92
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5647

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
9357%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1767%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1570%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1213%
#355
Xeon w7-3455
MSRP: $2489|Avg: $2625
99%
#356
EPYC 9334
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1810
99%
#357
Xeon w9-3575X
MSRP: $3789|Avg: $675
98%
#358
Xeon w7-3465X
MSRP: $2889|Avg: $468
98%
#359
Xeon Gold 6530
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $1846
97%
#359
EPYC 9354
MSRP: $3420|Avg: $2498
97%
#361
Xeon Silver 4114
MSRP: $612|Avg: $30
96%
#362
EPYC 7532
MSRP: $2380|Avg: $225
96%
#363
Xeon W-2191B
MSRP: $1333|Avg: $39
96%
#593
Xeon X5647
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#594
Xeon E5-1620 v2
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
100%
#605
Xeon E3-1270 v3
MSRP: $339|Avg: $410
96%
#607
Xeon E3-1235
MSRP: $240|Avg: $270
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X5647 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightFX-6330Xeon X5647
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-6330 ($25), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($25 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightFX-6330Xeon X5647
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-6330 and Xeon X5647

AMD

FX-6330

The FX-6330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 December 2015 (9 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,433 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Xeon X5647

The Xeon X5647 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,441 points. Launch price was $175.

Processing Power

The FX-6330 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon X5647 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the FX-6330 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the FX-6330 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon X5647 — a 27% clock advantage for the FX-6330 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The FX-6330 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon X5647 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the FX-6330 scores 4,433 against the Xeon X5647's 4,441 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon X5647. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the FX-6330 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5647.

FeatureFX-6330Xeon X5647
Cores / Threads
6 / 6+50%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+31%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+23%
2.93 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
6 MB+2300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Vishera (2012−2015)
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark
4,433
4,441
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-6330 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X5647 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-6330Xeon X5647
Socket
AM3+
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 5.0+150%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
RAM Channels
3
ECC Support
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (FX-6330) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon X5647). Primary use case: Xeon X5647 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5647 rivals Core i7-980X.

FeatureFX-6330Xeon X5647
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Workstation