FX-6330 vs Pentium 6805

AMD

FX-6330

6 Cores6 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium 6805

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······

FX-6330 vs Pentium 6805 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-6330 vs Pentium 6805 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-6330 vs Pentium 6805: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-6330

2015

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
  • Costs $52 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
  • Delivers 48.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.7 vs 27.5 PassMark/$ ($109 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.

Pentium 6805

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-6330 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (4,424 vs 4,433).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 40.7 PassMark/$ ($161 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is FX-6330 better than Pentium 6805?
Yes. FX-6330 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, FX-6330 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-6330 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
FX-6330 is the better buy right now. FX-6330 comes in $52 cheaper on MSRP at $109 MSRP versus $161 MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 48.0% better value on MSRP (40.7 vs 27.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium 6805 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

FX-6330 vs Pentium 6805 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FX-6330

The FX-6330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 December 2015 (9 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,433 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium 6805

The Pentium 6805 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-Y (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1526. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 4,424 points. Launch price was $161.

Processing Power

The FX-6330 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Pentium 6805 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the FX-6330 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the FX-6330 versus 3 GHz on the Pentium 6805 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the FX-6330 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The FX-6330 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium 6805 uses Ice Lake-Y (2020) (10 nm). In PassMark, the FX-6330 scores 4,433 against the Pentium 6805's 4,424 — a 0.2% lead for the FX-6330. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the FX-6330 vs 4 MB (total) on the Pentium 6805.

FeatureFX-6330Pentium 6805
Cores / Threads
6 / 6+200%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+40%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+227%
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+100%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
6 MB+2300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
10 nm-69%
Architecture
Vishera (2012−2015)
Ice Lake-Y (2020)
PassMark
4,433
4,424
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-6330 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium 6805 uses FCBGA1526 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-6330Pentium 6805
Socket
AM3+
FCBGA1526
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FX-6330 was priced at $109, while the Pentium 6805 came in at $161. On launch pricing ($109 vs $161), FX-6330 was $52 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-6330 delivers 40.7 pts/$ vs 27.5 pts/$ for the Pentium 6805 — making the FX-6330 the 38.7% better value option.

FeatureFX-6330Pentium 6805
MSRP
$109-32%
$161
Performance per Dollar
40.7+48%
27.5
Release Date
2015
2020

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.