FX-6330 vs Xeon L5639

FX-6330 vs Xeon L5639 Performance Spectrum

FX-6330

6 / 6

4,433

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon L5639

6 / 12

4,419

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-6330 vs Xeon L5639 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-6330 vs Xeon L5639: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-6330

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon L5639, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $109 MSRP, while Xeon L5639 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌108.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 60W.

Xeon L5639

2011

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
✅Draws 60W instead of 125W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,419 vs 4,433).

Quick Answers

So, is FX-6330 better than Xeon L5639?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L5639 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-6330 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-6330 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.9% more average FPS across 42 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-6330 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-6330 is the better buy right now. FX-6330 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $109 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 42 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (40.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FX-6330 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 6 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

FX-6330 vs Xeon L5639 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-6330

The FX-6330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 December 2015 (9 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,433 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon L5639

The Xeon L5639 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.133 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,419 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-6330 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, matching the Xeon L5639's 6 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the FX-6330 versus 2.67 GHz on the Xeon L5639 — a 44.5% clock advantage for the FX-6330 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.133 GHz). The FX-6330 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon L5639 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the FX-6330 scores 4,433 against the Xeon L5639's 4,419 — a 0.3% lead for the FX-6330. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the FX-6330 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon L5639.

Feature	FX-6330	Xeon L5639
Cores / Threads	6 / 6	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+57%	2.67 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+69%	2.133 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	6 MB+2300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Vishera (2012−2015)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	4,433	4,419