
Xeon Bronze 3106

Xeon E3-1220 v5
Xeon Bronze 3106 vs Xeon E3-1220 v5 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon Bronze 3106 vs Xeon E3-1220 v5 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon Bronze 3106 vs Xeon E3-1220 v5: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon Bronze 3106
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.6 vs 28.1 PassMark/$ ($395 MSRP vs $203 MSRP).
Xeon E3-1220 v5
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $192 less on MSRP ($203 MSRP vs $395 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 93.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 28.1 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($203 MSRP vs $395 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 85W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Bronze 3106 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,713 vs 5,753).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 11 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Bronze 3106 better than Xeon E3-1220 v5?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Bronze 3106 vs Xeon E3-1220 v5 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Bronze 3106
The Xeon Bronze 3106 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 5,753 points. Launch price was $306.

Xeon E3-1220 v5
The Xeon E3-1220 v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 5,713 points. Launch price was $203.
Processing Power
The Xeon Bronze 3106 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E3-1220 v5 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon Bronze 3106 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon Bronze 3106 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E3-1220 v5 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1220 v5 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon Bronze 3106 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1220 v5 uses Skylake-DT (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Bronze 3106 scores 5,753 against the Xeon E3-1220 v5's 5,713 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon Bronze 3106. L3 cache: 11 MB (total) on the Xeon Bronze 3106 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1220 v5.
| Feature | Xeon Bronze 3106 | Xeon E3-1220 v5 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.5 GHz+17% |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 3 GHz+76% |
| L3 Cache | 11 MB (total)+38% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Skylake-DT (2015) |
| PassMark | 5,753 | 5,713 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Bronze 3106 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1220 v5 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon Bronze 3106 | Xeon E3-1220 v5 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 768 | — |
| RAM Channels | 6 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Bronze 3106) / not specified (Xeon E3-1220 v5).
| Feature | Xeon Bronze 3106 | Xeon E3-1220 v5 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon Bronze 3106 was priced at $395, while the Xeon E3-1220 v5 came in at $203. On launch pricing ($395 vs $203), Xeon E3-1220 v5 was $192 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Bronze 3106 delivers 14.6 pts/$ vs 28.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1220 v5 — making the Xeon E3-1220 v5 the 63.6% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Bronze 3106 | Xeon E3-1220 v5 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $395 | $203-49% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.6 | 28.1+92% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2015 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















