Xeon Bronze 3106 vs Xeon E3-1225 v6

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Bronze 3106 vs Xeon E3-1225 v6 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Bronze 3106 vs Xeon E3-1225 v6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Bronze 3106

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +26.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $395 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1225 v6 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌16.4% higher power demand at 85W vs 73W.

Xeon E3-1225 v6

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 73W instead of 85W, a 12W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Bronze 3106 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,740 vs 5,753).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 11 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Bronze 3106 better than Xeon E3-1225 v6?

Yes. Xeon Bronze 3106 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 26.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Bronze 3106 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 26.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Bronze 3106 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 37.5% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Bronze 3106 is the better buy right now. Xeon Bronze 3106 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $395 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 26.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (14.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Bronze 3106 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 37.5% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 8 MB), more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/4, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon Bronze 3106 vs Xeon E3-1225 v6 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Bronze 3106

The Xeon Bronze 3106 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 5,753 points. Launch price was $306.

Xeon E3-1225 v6

The Xeon E3-1225 v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,740 points. Launch price was $213.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Bronze 3106 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E3-1225 v6 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon Bronze 3106 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon Bronze 3106 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1225 v6 — a 20.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1225 v6 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Xeon Bronze 3106 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1225 v6 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Bronze 3106 scores 5,753 against the Xeon E3-1225 v6's 5,740 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon Bronze 3106. L3 cache: 11 MB (total) on the Xeon Bronze 3106 vs 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1225 v6.

Feature	Xeon Bronze 3106	Xeon E3-1225 v6
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.7 GHz+23%
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	3.3 GHz+94%
L3 Cache	11 MB (total)+38%	8 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	5,753	5,740

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Bronze 3106 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1225 v6 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.