Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs Xeon Bronze 3106

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs Xeon Bronze 3106 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

4 / 4

5,831

+1.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon Bronze 3106

8 / 8

5,753

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs Xeon Bronze 3106 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs Xeon Bronze 3106: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

2019

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Bronze 3106 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 11 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Bronze 3106, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Bronze 3106

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+175% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,753 vs 5,831).
❌Launch MSRP is still $395 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U better than Xeon Bronze 3106?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Bronze 3106 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Bronze 3106 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $395 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Bronze 3106 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 24.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Bronze 3106 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (14.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs Xeon Bronze 3106 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,831 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon Bronze 3106

The Xeon Bronze 3106 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 5,753 points. Launch price was $306.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon Bronze 3106 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon Bronze 3106 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Bronze 3106 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon Bronze 3106 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U scores 5,831 against the Xeon Bronze 3106's 5,753 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs 11 MB (total) on the Xeon Bronze 3106.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U	Xeon Bronze 3106
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+17%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+24%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	11 MB (total)+175%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	12 nm-14%	14 nm
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	5,831+1%	5,753

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Bronze 3106 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.