Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs Xeon E3-1515M v5

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs Xeon E3-1515M v5 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

4 / 4

5,831

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1515M v5

4 / 8

5,925

+1.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs Xeon E3-1515M v5 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs Xeon E3-1515M v5: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1515M v5 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,831 vs 5,925).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1515M v5, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 16 PCIe lanes.
❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E3-1515M v5 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Xeon E3-1515M v5

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.6% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 16 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Pro Graphics P580, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1515M v5 better than Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1515M v5 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1515M v5 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.6% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1515M v5 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1515M v5 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E3-1515M v5 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.6% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs Xeon E3-1515M v5 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,831 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1515M v5

The Xeon E3-1515M v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-H (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,925 points. Launch price was $489.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E3-1515M v5's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1515M v5 — a 5.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1515M v5 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E3-1515M v5 uses Skylake-H (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U scores 5,831 against the Xeon E3-1515M v5's 5,925 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon E3-1515M v5. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1515M v5.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U	Xeon E3-1515M v5
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	3.7 GHz+6%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.8 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	12 nm-14%	14 nm
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	Skylake-H (2015−2016)
PassMark	5,831	5,925+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,017

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1515M v5 uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U	Xeon E3-1515M v5
Socket	FP5	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity	—	64 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E3-1515M v5). The Xeon E3-1515M v5 includes integrated graphics (Iris Pro Graphics P580), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E3-1515M v5 targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Xeon E3-1515M v5 rivals Core i7-6700HQ.