Core i5-8265U vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

Core i5-8265U vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U Performance Spectrum

Core i5-8265U

4 / 8

5,812

0.0%

5,831

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-8265U vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-8265U vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-8265U

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 620, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,812 vs 5,831).

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-8265U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-8265U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U better than Core i5-8265U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-8265U is ahead with a 7.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. Core i5-8265U also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-8265U vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-8265U

The Core i5-8265U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,812 points. Launch price was $297.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,831 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-8265U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i5-8265U versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-8265U (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-8265U uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8265U scores 5,812 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U's 5,831 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-8265U vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U.

Feature	Core i5-8265U	Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+11%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.1 GHz+31%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	12 nm-14%
Architecture	Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)	Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark	5,812	5,831
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,200	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,500	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-8265U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-8265U	Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
Socket	FCBGA1528	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-8265U) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U). The Core i5-8265U includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 620), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-8265U targets Mainstream Laptop.