Core i5-8265U vs Core i7-4710MQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-8265U vs Core i7-4710MQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-8265U vs Core i7-4710MQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-8265U

2018

Why buy it

✅+9.4% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Draws 15W instead of 47W, a 32W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4710MQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Core i7-4710MQ

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (3,200 vs 3,500).
❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while Core i5-8265U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌213.3% higher power demand at 47W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-8265U better than Core i7-4710MQ?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4710MQ is ahead with a 7.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-8265U pulls ahead with 9.4% better Geekbench multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-8265U is the stronger fit. You are getting 9.4% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-8265U is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-8265U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $378 MSRP, and it still gives you 9.4% better Geekbench multi-core. Core i7-4710MQ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (15.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA946.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-8265U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-8265U vs Core i7-4710MQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-8265U

The Core i5-8265U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,812 points. Launch price was $297.

Core i7-4710MQ

The Core i7-4710MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,792 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-8265U and Core i7-4710MQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i5-8265U versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-4710MQ — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-8265U (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-8265U uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4710MQ uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8265U scores 5,812 against the Core i7-4710MQ's 5,792 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-8265U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,200 vs 950, a 23.3% lead for the Core i5-8265U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 3,500 vs 3,200 (9% advantage for the Core i5-8265U). Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i5-8265U	Core i7-4710MQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+11%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.5 GHz+56%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	5,812	5,792
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,200+26%	950
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,500+9%	3,200

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-8265U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4710MQ uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i5-8265U versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i7-4710MQ — the Core i5-8265U supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-8265U supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core i5-8265U) and HM86,HM87,QM87 (Core i7-4710MQ).

Feature	Core i5-8265U	Core i7-4710MQ
Socket	FCBGA1528	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+50%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-8265U) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i7-4710MQ). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Core i5-8265U) and Intel HD Graphics 4600 (Core i7-4710MQ) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-8265U targets Mainstream Laptop, Core i7-4710MQ targets Laptop.

Feature	Core i5-8265U	Core i7-4710MQ
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 620	Intel HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, EPT
Target Use	Mainstream Laptop	Laptop