Core i5-8265U vs Core i7-4722HQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-8265U vs Core i7-4722HQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-8265U vs Core i7-4722HQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-8265U

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 620, while Core i7-4722HQ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4722HQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌1400% higher power demand at 15W vs 1W.

Core i7-4722HQ

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 15W, a 14W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,768 vs 5,812).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-8265U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-8265U better than Core i7-4722HQ?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4722HQ is ahead with a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-8265U pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-8265U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-8265U still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-8265U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-8265U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-8265U vs Core i7-4722HQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-8265U

The Core i5-8265U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,812 points. Launch price was $297.

Core i7-4722HQ

The Core i7-4722HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,768 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-8265U and Core i7-4722HQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i5-8265U versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4722HQ — a 13.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-8265U (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-8265U uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4722HQ uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8265U scores 5,812 against the Core i7-4722HQ's 5,768 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-8265U. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-8265U vs 6 MB on the Core i7-4722HQ.

Feature	Core i5-8265U	Core i7-4722HQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+15%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.4 GHz+50%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	6 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1 MB+300%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	5,812	5,768
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,200	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,500	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-8265U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4722HQ uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-8265U	Core i7-4722HQ
Socket	FCBGA1528	BGA1364
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-8265U) / not specified (Core i7-4722HQ). The Core i5-8265U includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 620), while the Core i7-4722HQ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-8265U targets Mainstream Laptop.