Core i5-7600T vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

Core i5-7600T vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U Performance Spectrum

Core i5-7600T

4 / 4

5,827

0.0%

5,831

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-7600T vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-7600T vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-7600T

2017

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,827 vs 5,831).
❌Launch MSRP is still $192 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7600T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-7600T.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U better than Core i5-7600T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-7600T is ahead with a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Core i5-7600T also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is still the much better call for a fresh build. Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $192 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. Core i5-7600T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (30.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-7600T vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7600T

The Core i5-7600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,827 points. Launch price was $224.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,831 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-7600T and Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-7600T versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U — a 5.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-7600T (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-7600T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7600T scores 5,827 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U's 5,831 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7600T vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U.

Feature	Core i5-7600T	Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+6%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+33%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	12 nm-14%
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark	5,827	5,831
Geekbench 6 Single	1,243	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-7600T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-7600T	Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
Socket	LGA1151	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7600T) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U). The Core i5-7600T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7600T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-7600T rivals Ryzen 3 1300X.