
Core i5-7600T

Opteron 6378
Core i5-7600T vs Opteron 6378 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-7600T vs Opteron 6378 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-7600T vs Opteron 6378: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-7600T
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 115W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 630, while Opteron 6378 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Opteron 6378.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6378 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,827 vs 5,889).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6378, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $192 MSRP, while Opteron 6378 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Opteron 6378
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌228.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7600T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-7600T.
Quick Answers
So, is Opteron 6378 better than Core i5-7600T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-7600T vs Opteron 6378 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7600T
The Core i5-7600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,827 points. Launch price was $224.

Opteron 6378
The Opteron 6378 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,889 points. Launch price was $396.
Processing Power
The Core i5-7600T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 6378 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6378 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-7600T versus 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 6378 — a 11.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-7600T (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-7600T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 6378 uses Abu Dhabi (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7600T scores 5,827 against the Opteron 6378's 5,889 — a 1.1% lead for the Opteron 6378. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7600T vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6378.
| Feature | Core i5-7600T | Opteron 6378 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 16 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+12% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+17% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+1500% | 16 MB |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Abu Dhabi (2012) |
| PassMark | 5,827 | 5,889+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,243 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-7600T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6378 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-7600T | Opteron 6378 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7600T) / not specified (Opteron 6378). The Core i5-7600T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Opteron 6378 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7600T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-7600T rivals Ryzen 3 1300X.
| Feature | Core i5-7600T | Opteron 6378 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















