CPU
GPU
Core i5-7600T
Core i7-4800MQ
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-7600T is positioned at rank 591 and the Core i7-4800MQ is on rank 971, so the Core i5-7600T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-7600T
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4800MQ
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-7600T | Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($60) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($378) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-7600T | Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+536%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($60) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($378) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-7600T and Core i7-4800MQ
Core i5-7600T
The Core i5-7600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,827 points. Launch price was $224.
Core i7-4800MQ
The Core i7-4800MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,773 points. Launch price was $378.
Processing Power
The Core i5-7600T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-4800MQ's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-7600T versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-4800MQ — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-7600T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4800MQ uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7600T scores 5,827 against the Core i7-4800MQ's 5,773 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-7600T. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7600T vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4800MQ.
| Feature | Core i5-7600T | Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+4% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 5,827 | 5,773 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,243 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-7600T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4800MQ uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-7600T | Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | PGA946 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7600T) / not specified (Core i7-4800MQ). The Core i5-7600T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Core i7-4800MQ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7600T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-7600T rivals Ryzen 3 1300X.
| Feature | Core i5-7600T | Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-7600T launched at $192 MSRP, while the Core i7-4800MQ debuted at $380. At current prices ($60 vs $378), the Core i5-7600T is $318 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-7600T delivers 97.1 pts/$ vs 15.3 pts/$ for the Core i7-4800MQ — making the Core i5-7600T the 145.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-7600T | Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $192-49% | $380 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-84% | $378 |
| Performance per Dollar | 97.1+535% | 15.3 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-7600T and Core i7-4800MQ
