Core i5-7600T vs Core i7-4800MQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-7600T vs Core i7-4800MQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-7600T vs Core i7-4800MQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-7600T

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $188 less on MSRP ($192 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
✅Delivers 99.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.3 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 47W, a 12W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4800MQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Core i7-4800MQ

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,773 vs 5,827).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.2 vs 30.3 PassMark/$ ($380 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
❌34.3% higher power demand at 47W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7600T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-7600T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-7600T better than Core i7-4800MQ?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4800MQ is ahead with a 14.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7600T pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark. Core i7-4800MQ also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7600T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-7600T is the better buy right now. Core i5-7600T comes in $188 cheaper on MSRP at $192 MSRP versus $380 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-4800MQ is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 14.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 99.8% better value on MSRP (30.3 vs 15.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-7600T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-7600T vs Core i7-4800MQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7600T

The Core i5-7600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,827 points. Launch price was $224.

Core i7-4800MQ

The Core i7-4800MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,773 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-7600T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-4800MQ's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-7600T versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-4800MQ — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-7600T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4800MQ uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7600T scores 5,827 against the Core i7-4800MQ's 5,773 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-7600T. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7600T vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4800MQ.

Feature	Core i5-7600T	Core i7-4800MQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+4%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	5,827	5,773
Geekbench 6 Single	1,243	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-7600T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4800MQ uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-7600T	Core i7-4800MQ
Socket	LGA1151	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7600T) / not specified (Core i7-4800MQ). The Core i5-7600T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Core i7-4800MQ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7600T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-7600T rivals Ryzen 3 1300X.

Feature	Core i5-7600T	Core i7-4800MQ
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Low Power Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-7600T was priced at $192, while the Core i7-4800MQ came in at $380. On launch pricing ($192 vs $380), Core i5-7600T was $188 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-7600T delivers 30.3 pts/$ vs 15.2 pts/$ for the Core i7-4800MQ — making the Core i5-7600T the 66.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-7600T	Core i7-4800MQ
MSRP	$192-49%	$380
Performance per Dollar	30.3+99%	15.2
Release Date	2017	2013

Search Core i5-7600T on Amazon

Search Core i7-4800MQ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.