Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs Xeon E-2104G

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs Xeon E-2104G Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

4 / 4

5,831

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E-2104G

4 / 4

5,858

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs Xeon E-2104G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs Xeon E-2104G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,831 vs 5,858).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

Xeon E-2104G

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $193 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U better than Xeon E-2104G?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2104G makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2104G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E-2104G is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $193 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E-2104G is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. Xeon E-2104G is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (30.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs Xeon E-2104G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,831 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E-2104G

The Xeon E-2104G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 July 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 5,858 points. Launch price was $193.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U and Xeon E-2104G share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E-2104G — a 9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E-2104G uses Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U scores 5,831 against the Xeon E-2104G's 5,858 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E-2104G. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2104G.

Feature	Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U	Xeon E-2104G
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+9%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+52%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	12 nm-14%	14 nm
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019)
PassMark	5,831	5,858

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E-2104G uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.