
Core i7-4800MQ

Xeon Bronze 3106
Core i7-4800MQ vs Xeon Bronze 3106 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-4800MQ vs Xeon Bronze 3106 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-4800MQ vs Xeon Bronze 3106: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-4800MQ
2013Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $15 less on MSRP ($380 MSRP vs $395 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 47W instead of 85W, a 38W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Bronze 3106 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 11 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Bronze 3106, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Bronze 3106
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,753 vs 5,773).
- ❌3.9% HIGHER MSRP$395 MSRPvs$380 MSRP
- ❌80.9% higher power demand at 85W vs 47W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-4800MQ better than Xeon Bronze 3106?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4800MQ vs Xeon Bronze 3106 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4800MQ
The Core i7-4800MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,773 points. Launch price was $378.

Xeon Bronze 3106
The Xeon Bronze 3106 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 5,753 points. Launch price was $306.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4800MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Bronze 3106 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon Bronze 3106 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-4800MQ versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Bronze 3106 — a 20.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-4800MQ (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i7-4800MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Bronze 3106 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4800MQ scores 5,773 against the Xeon Bronze 3106's 5,753 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-4800MQ. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4800MQ vs 11 MB (total) on the Xeon Bronze 3106.
| Feature | Core i7-4800MQ | Xeon Bronze 3106 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+23% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+59% | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 11 MB (total)+38% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+25500% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 5,773 | 5,753 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4800MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Bronze 3106 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4800MQ | Xeon Bronze 3106 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA946 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4800MQ) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Bronze 3106).
| Feature | Core i7-4800MQ | Xeon Bronze 3106 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-4800MQ was priced at $380, while the Xeon Bronze 3106 came in at $395. On launch pricing ($380 vs $395), Core i7-4800MQ was $15 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4800MQ delivers 15.2 pts/$ vs 14.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Bronze 3106 — making the Core i7-4800MQ the 4.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4800MQ | Xeon Bronze 3106 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $380-4% | $395 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.2+4% | 14.6 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















