Core i7-4800MQ vs Xeon E-2104G

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4800MQ vs Xeon E-2104G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4800MQ vs Xeon E-2104G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4800MQ

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 47W instead of 65W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,773 vs 5,858).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.2 vs 30.4 PassMark/$ ($380 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).

Xeon E-2104G

2018

Why buy it

✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $187 less on MSRP ($193 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
✅Delivers 99.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.4 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4800MQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌38.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 47W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2104G better than Core i7-4800MQ?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2104G makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4800MQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2104G is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2104G is the better buy right now. Xeon E-2104G comes in $187 cheaper on MSRP at $193 MSRP versus $380 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-4800MQ is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 23.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 99.8% better value on MSRP (30.4 vs 15.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2104G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4800MQ vs Xeon E-2104G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4800MQ

The Core i7-4800MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,773 points. Launch price was $378.

Xeon E-2104G

The Xeon E-2104G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 July 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 5,858 points. Launch price was $193.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4800MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon E-2104G's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-4800MQ versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E-2104G — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-4800MQ (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-4800MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E-2104G uses Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4800MQ scores 5,773 against the Xeon E-2104G's 5,858 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon E-2104G. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-4800MQ	Xeon E-2104G
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+16%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3.2 GHz+19%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019)
PassMark	5,773	5,858+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4800MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E-2104G uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4800MQ	Xeon E-2104G
Socket	PGA946	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4800MQ was priced at $380, while the Xeon E-2104G came in at $193. On launch pricing ($380 vs $193), Xeon E-2104G was $187 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4800MQ delivers 15.2 pts/$ vs 30.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E-2104G — making the Xeon E-2104G the 66.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-4800MQ	Xeon E-2104G
MSRP	$380	$193-49%
Performance per Dollar	15.2	30.4+100%
Release Date	2013	2018

Search Core i7-4800MQ on Amazon

Search Xeon E-2104G on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.