Core i7-4800MQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

Core i7-4800MQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U Performance Spectrum

Core i7-4800MQ

4 / 8

5,773

0.0%

5,831

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4800MQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4800MQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4800MQ

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,773 vs 5,831).
❌Launch MSRP is still $380 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌213.3% higher power demand at 47W vs 15W.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

2019

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 47W, a 32W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4800MQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U better than Core i7-4800MQ?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4800MQ is ahead with a 17.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark. Core i7-4800MQ also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is still the much better call for a fresh build. Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $380 MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. Core i7-4800MQ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (15.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA946.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4800MQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4800MQ

The Core i7-4800MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,773 points. Launch price was $378.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,831 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4800MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-4800MQ versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U — a 5.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-4800MQ (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-4800MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4800MQ scores 5,773 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U's 5,831 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4800MQ vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U.

Feature	Core i7-4800MQ	Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+6%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+29%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+100%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	22 nm	12 nm-45%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark	5,773	5,831+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4800MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.