Core i7-4800MQ vs Ryzen Embedded R2314

Intel

Core i7-4800MQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded R2314

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2022
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-4800MQ vs Ryzen Embedded R2314 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4800MQ vs Ryzen Embedded R2314 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4800MQ vs Ryzen Embedded R2314: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4800MQ

2013

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +22.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (5,773 vs 5,850).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.2 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($380 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 213.3% higher power demand at 47W vs 15W.

Ryzen Embedded R2314

2022

Why buy it

  • +1.3% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $80 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
  • Delivers 28.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.5 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
  • Draws 15W instead of 47W, a 32W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4800MQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded R2314 better than Core i7-4800MQ?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4800MQ is ahead with a 22.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R2314 pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark. Core i7-4800MQ also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded R2314 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Embedded R2314 is the better buy right now. Ryzen Embedded R2314 comes in $80 cheaper on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $380 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-4800MQ is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 22.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 28.4% better value on MSRP (19.5 vs 15.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Embedded R2314 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4800MQ vs Ryzen Embedded R2314 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-4800MQ

The Core i7-4800MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,773 points. Launch price was $378.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded R2314

The Ryzen Embedded R2314 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 June 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,850 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i7-4800MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen Embedded R2314's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-4800MQ versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R2314 — a 5.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-4800MQ (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-4800MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R2314 uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4800MQ scores 5,773 against the Ryzen Embedded R2314's 5,850 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R2314. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4800MQ vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R2314.

FeatureCore i7-4800MQRyzen Embedded R2314
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz+6%
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+29%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+100%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
22 nm
12 nm-45%
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark
5,773
5,850+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4800MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R2314 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-4800MQRyzen Embedded R2314
Socket
PGA946
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4800MQ was priced at $380, while the Ryzen Embedded R2314 came in at $300. On launch pricing ($380 vs $300), Ryzen Embedded R2314 was $80 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4800MQ delivers 15.2 pts/$ vs 19.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded R2314 — making the Ryzen Embedded R2314 the 24.8% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-4800MQRyzen Embedded R2314
MSRP
$380
$300-21%
Performance per Dollar
15.2
19.5+28%
Release Date
2013
2022

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.