PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4710MQ vs Xeon Bronze 3106 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4710MQ vs Xeon Bronze 3106: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4710MQ

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $17 less on MSRP ($378 MSRP vs $395 MSRP).
✅Draws 47W instead of 85W, a 38W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4600, while Xeon Bronze 3106 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Bronze 3106 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 11 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Bronze 3106, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Bronze 3106

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+83.3% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅200% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,753 vs 5,792).
❌
4.5% HIGHER MSRP
$395 MSRPvs$378 MSRP
❌80.9% higher power demand at 85W vs 47W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4710MQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4710MQ better than Xeon Bronze 3106?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Bronze 3106 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4710MQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4710MQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4710MQ is the better buy right now. Core i7-4710MQ comes in $17 cheaper on MSRP at $378 MSRP versus $395 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Bronze 3106 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 5.2% better value on MSRP (15.3 vs 14.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Bronze 3106 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013), 83.3% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 6 MB), and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4710MQ vs Xeon Bronze 3106 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4710MQ

The Core i7-4710MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,792 points. Launch price was $378.

Xeon Bronze 3106

The Xeon Bronze 3106 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 5,753 points. Launch price was $306.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4710MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Bronze 3106 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon Bronze 3106 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-4710MQ versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Bronze 3106 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-4710MQ (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Core i7-4710MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Bronze 3106 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4710MQ scores 5,792 against the Xeon Bronze 3106's 5,753 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-4710MQ. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-4710MQ vs 11 MB (total) on the Xeon Bronze 3106.

Feature	Core i7-4710MQ	Xeon Bronze 3106
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+17%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+47%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	11 MB (total)+83%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB (per core)
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	5,792	5,753
Geekbench 6 Single	950	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,200	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4710MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Bronze 3106 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i7-4710MQ versus 2133 on the Xeon Bronze 3106 — the Xeon Bronze 3106 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Bronze 3106 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 2300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-4710MQ) vs 6 (Xeon Bronze 3106). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-4710MQ) vs 48 (Xeon Bronze 3106) — the Xeon Bronze 3106 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM86,HM87,QM87 (Core i7-4710MQ) and C621 (Xeon Bronze 3106).

Feature	Core i7-4710MQ	Xeon Bronze 3106
Socket	PGA946	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	768 GB+2300%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	48+200%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Bronze 3106 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Core i7-4710MQ) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Bronze 3106). The Core i7-4710MQ includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon Bronze 3106 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4710MQ targets Laptop.

Feature	Core i7-4710MQ	Xeon Bronze 3106
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 4600	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Laptop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4710MQ was priced at $378, while the Xeon Bronze 3106 came in at $395. On launch pricing ($378 vs $395), Core i7-4710MQ was $17 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4710MQ delivers 15.3 pts/$ vs 14.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Bronze 3106 — making the Core i7-4710MQ the 5.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-4710MQ	Xeon Bronze 3106
MSRP	$378-4%	$395
Performance per Dollar	15.3+5%	14.6
Release Date	2013	2017

Search Core i7-4710MQ on Amazon

Search Xeon Bronze 3106 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.