
Core i7-4710MQ

Xeon E-2104G
Core i7-4710MQ vs Xeon E-2104G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-4710MQ vs Xeon E-2104G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-4710MQ vs Xeon E-2104G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-4710MQ
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 47W instead of 65W, a 18W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4600, while Xeon E-2104G needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,792 vs 5,858).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 30.4 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
Xeon E-2104G
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Costs $185 less on MSRP ($193 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.4 vs 15.3 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4710MQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌38.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 47W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4710MQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E-2104G better than Core i7-4710MQ?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4710MQ vs Xeon E-2104G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4710MQ
The Core i7-4710MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,792 points. Launch price was $378.

Xeon E-2104G
The Xeon E-2104G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 July 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 5,858 points. Launch price was $193.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4710MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon E-2104G's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-4710MQ versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E-2104G — a 9% clock advantage for the Core i7-4710MQ (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-4710MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E-2104G uses Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4710MQ scores 5,792 against the Xeon E-2104G's 5,858 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E-2104G. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-4710MQ vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2104G.
| Feature | Core i7-4710MQ | Xeon E-2104G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+9% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 5,792 | 5,858+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 950 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,200 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4710MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E-2104G uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4710MQ | Xeon E-2104G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA946 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i7-4710MQ) / not specified (Xeon E-2104G). The Core i7-4710MQ includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon E-2104G requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4710MQ targets Laptop.
| Feature | Core i7-4710MQ | Xeon E-2104G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Laptop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-4710MQ was priced at $378, while the Xeon E-2104G came in at $193. On launch pricing ($378 vs $193), Xeon E-2104G was $185 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4710MQ delivers 15.3 pts/$ vs 30.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E-2104G — making the Xeon E-2104G the 65.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4710MQ | Xeon E-2104G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $378 | $193-49% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.3 | 30.4+99% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














