
Core i7-4710MQ

Ryzen Embedded R2314
Core i7-4710MQ vs Ryzen Embedded R2314 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-4710MQ vs Ryzen Embedded R2314 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-4710MQ vs Ryzen Embedded R2314: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-4710MQ
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4600, while Ryzen Embedded R2314 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,792 vs 5,850).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌213.3% higher power demand at 47W vs 15W.
Ryzen Embedded R2314
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $78 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.5 vs 15.3 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 47W, a 32W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4710MQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4710MQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Embedded R2314 better than Core i7-4710MQ?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4710MQ vs Ryzen Embedded R2314 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4710MQ
The Core i7-4710MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,792 points. Launch price was $378.


Ryzen Embedded R2314
The Ryzen Embedded R2314 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 June 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,850 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4710MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen Embedded R2314's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-4710MQ versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R2314 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-4710MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R2314 uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4710MQ scores 5,792 against the Ryzen Embedded R2314's 5,850 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R2314. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-4710MQ vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R2314.
| Feature | Core i7-4710MQ | Ryzen Embedded R2314 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+19% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 12 nm-45% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| PassMark | 5,792 | 5,850+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 950 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,200 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4710MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R2314 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4710MQ | Ryzen Embedded R2314 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA946 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Core i7-4710MQ) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded R2314). The Core i7-4710MQ includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4600), while the Ryzen Embedded R2314 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4710MQ targets Laptop.
| Feature | Core i7-4710MQ | Ryzen Embedded R2314 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Laptop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-4710MQ was priced at $378, while the Ryzen Embedded R2314 came in at $300. On launch pricing ($378 vs $300), Ryzen Embedded R2314 was $78 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4710MQ delivers 15.3 pts/$ vs 19.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded R2314 — making the Ryzen Embedded R2314 the 24% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4710MQ | Ryzen Embedded R2314 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $378 | $300-21% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.3 | 19.5+27% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














