Xeon Bronze 3204
VS
Core i3-7320

Xeon Bronze 3204 vs Core i3-7320

Intel

Xeon Bronze 3204

6 Cores6 Thrd85 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core i3-7320

2 Cores4 Thrd51 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon Bronze 3204 is positioned at rank 572 and the Core i3-7320 is on rank 434, so the Core i3-7320 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Bronze 3204

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
8663%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1636%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1453%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1123%
#348
Xeon Gold 6426Y
MSRP: $2145|Avg: N/A
98%
#349
EPYC 4565P
MSRP: $2730|Avg: $1980
98%
#351
Xeon W-2295
MSRP: $1333|Avg: $1400
97%
#352
Xeon 6741P
MSRP: $4421|Avg: $3780
95%
#572
Xeon Bronze 3204
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#573
Xeon E7450
MSRP: $417|Avg: $80
99%
#575
Xeon E3-1225 v3
MSRP: $224|Avg: $29
99%
#577
Xeon E5-1620 v3
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
99%
#583
Xeon E3-1245 v2
MSRP: $273|Avg: $204
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7320

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6388%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6036%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4382%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1320%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1046%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
915%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
524%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
517%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
471%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
471%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
466%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
453%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
447%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
445%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
441%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
97%
#348
Athlon PRO 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $81
97%
#349
Core i5-9600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $219
96%
#350
Core i3-8300
MSRP: $138|Avg: $136
96%
#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
95%
#352
Core i7-13700TE
MSRP: $390|Avg: $476
95%
#434
Core i3-7320
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
100%
#435
Celeron G3930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $39
99%
#436
Ryzen 5 1500X
MSRP: $189|Avg: $67
98%
#444
Pentium G4560T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $20
96%
#449
Ryzen 5 1400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $91
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon Bronze 3204 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon Bronze 3204Core i3-7320
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-7320 ($40), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($40 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon Bronze 3204Core i3-7320
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Bronze 3204 and Core i3-7320

Intel

Xeon Bronze 3204

The Xeon Bronze 3204 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 4,797 points. Launch price was $213.

Intel

Core i3-7320

The Core i3-7320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,831 points. Launch price was $157.

Processing Power

The Xeon Bronze 3204 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Core i3-7320 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon Bronze 3204 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Xeon Bronze 3204 versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i3-7320 — a 73.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-7320 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Xeon Bronze 3204 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-7320 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Bronze 3204 scores 4,797 against the Core i3-7320's 4,831 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-7320. L3 cache: 8.25 MB on the Xeon Bronze 3204 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-7320.

FeatureXeon Bronze 3204Core i3-7320
Cores / Threads
6 / 6+200%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
1.9 GHz
4.1 GHz+116%
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
4.1 GHz+116%
L3 Cache
8.25 MB+106%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
6 MB+2300%
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
4,797
4,831
Geekbench 6 Single
1,388
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Bronze 3204 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-7320 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the Xeon Bronze 3204 versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7320 — the Xeon Bronze 3204 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Bronze 3204 supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 64 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Bronze 3204) vs 2 (Core i3-7320). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Bronze 3204) vs 16 (Core i3-7320) — the Xeon Bronze 3204 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Bronze 3204) and B250,H270,Z270,Q250,Q270 (Core i3-7320).

FeatureXeon Bronze 3204Core i3-7320
Socket
LGA3647
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
2133+53225%
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
1024
64 GB+6553500%
RAM Channels
6+200%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
48+200%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Bronze 3204 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Bronze 3204) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7320). The Core i3-7320 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Xeon Bronze 3204 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7320 targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: Xeon Bronze 3204 rivals EPYC 7232P; Core i3-7320 rivals Ryzen 3 1300X.

FeatureXeon Bronze 3204Core i3-7320
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Mainstream Desktop