Xeon D-1537 vs Xeon E5-2608L v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon D-1537 vs Xeon E5-2608L v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon D-1537 vs Xeon E5-2608L v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon D-1537

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 50W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,444 vs 7,447).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.8 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($470 MSRP vs $363 MSRP).

Xeon E5-2608L v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅+1233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 1.5 MB).
✅Costs $107 less on MSRP ($363 MSRP vs $470 MSRP).
✅Delivers 29.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.5 vs 15.8 PassMark/$ ($363 MSRP vs $470 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌42.9% higher power demand at 50W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2608L v4 better than Xeon D-1537?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon D-1537 is ahead with a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2608L v4 pulls ahead with 0% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2608L v4 also has the bigger cache pool with 1233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2608L v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 1233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2608L v4 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2608L v4 comes in $107 cheaper on MSRP at $363 MSRP versus $470 MSRP, and it still gives you 0% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon D-1537 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 29.5% better value on MSRP (20.5 vs 15.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2608L v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2015), 1233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 1.5 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon D-1537 vs Xeon E5-2608L v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon D-1537

The Xeon D-1537 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (per core). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,444 points. Launch price was $470.

Xeon E5-2608L v4

The Xeon E5-2608L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 7,447 points. Launch price was $363.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon D-1537 and Xeon E5-2608L v4 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Xeon D-1537 versus 1.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2608L v4 — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Xeon D-1537. Both are built on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon D-1537 scores 7,444 against the Xeon E5-2608L v4's 7,447 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E5-2608L v4. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (per core) on the Xeon D-1537 vs 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2608L v4.

Feature	Xeon D-1537	Xeon E5-2608L v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz+44%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	—
L3 Cache	1.5 MB (per core)	20 MB+1233%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	7,444	7,447

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon D-1537 was priced at $470, while the Xeon E5-2608L v4 came in at $363. On launch pricing ($470 vs $363), Xeon E5-2608L v4 was $107 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon D-1537 delivers 15.8 pts/$ vs 20.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2608L v4 — making the Xeon E5-2608L v4 the 25.7% better value option.

Feature	Xeon D-1537	Xeon E5-2608L v4
MSRP	$470	$363-23%
Performance per Dollar	15.8	20.5+30%
Release Date	2015	2016

Search Xeon D-1537 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2608L v4 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.