Xeon D-1567 vs Xeon E5-4640 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon D-1567 vs Xeon E5-4640 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon D-1567 vs Xeon E5-4640 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon D-1567

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $157 less on MSRP ($2,702 MSRP vs $2,859 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4640 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 30 MB).

Xeon E5-4640 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+1900% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 1.5 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (10,372 vs 10,447).
❌
5.8% HIGHER MSRP
$2,859 MSRPvs$2,702 MSRP
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1567 better than Xeon E5-4640 v3?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-4640 v3 is ahead with a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1567 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Xeon E5-4640 v3 also has the bigger cache pool with 1900% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1567 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-1567 is the better buy right now. Xeon D-1567 comes in $157 cheaper on MSRP at $2,702 MSRP versus $2,859 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-4640 v3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 6.6% better value on MSRP (3.9 vs 3.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1567 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon D-1567 vs Xeon E5-4640 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon D-1567

The Xeon D-1567 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (per core). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 10,447 points. Launch price was $1,069.

Xeon E5-4640 v3

The Xeon E5-4640 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,372 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon D-1567 and Xeon E5-4640 v3 share an identical 12-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Xeon D-1567 versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4640 v3 — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Xeon D-1567 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Xeon D-1567 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4640 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon D-1567 scores 10,447 against the Xeon E5-4640 v3's 10,372 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon D-1567. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (per core) on the Xeon D-1567 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4640 v3.

Feature	Xeon D-1567	Xeon E5-4640 v3
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	12 / 24
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+4%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+11%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	1.5 MB (per core)	30 MB (total)+1900%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	10,447	10,372
Geekbench 6 Single	—	750
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	7,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-1567 uses the FCBGA1667 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4640 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon D-1567	Xeon E5-4640 v3
Socket	FCBGA1667	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-1866
Max RAM Capacity	—	768 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon D-1567) / Yes (Xeon E5-4640 v3).

Feature	Xeon D-1567	Xeon E5-4640 v3
Integrated GPU	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	Yes

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon D-1567 was priced at $2702, while the Xeon E5-4640 v3 came in at $2859. On launch pricing ($2702 vs $2859), Xeon D-1567 was $157 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon D-1567 delivers 3.9 pts/$ vs 3.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4640 v3 — making the Xeon D-1567 the 6.4% better value option.

Feature	Xeon D-1567	Xeon E5-4640 v3
MSRP	$2702-5%	$2859
Performance per Dollar	3.9+8%	3.6
Release Date	2016	2015

Search Xeon D-1567 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-4640 v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.