Xeon D-1567 vs Xeon E7540

Intel

Xeon D-1567

12 Cores24 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Xeon E7540

6 Cores12 Thrd105 WWMax: 2.27 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Xeon D-1567 vs Xeon E7540 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon D-1567 vs Xeon E7540 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon D-1567 vs Xeon E7540: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon D-1567

2016

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 18 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.9 vs 5.2 PassMark/$ ($2,702 MSRP vs $1,980 MSRP).

Xeon E7540

2010

Why buy it

  • +1100% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 1.5 MB).
  • Costs $722 less on MSRP ($1,980 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
  • Delivers 35.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 5.2 vs 3.9 PassMark/$ ($1,980 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon D-1567 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (10,376 vs 10,447).
  • 61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1567 better than Xeon E7540?
Yes. Xeon D-1567 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon D-1567 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.2% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1567 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon D-1567 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E7540 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon D-1567 comes in 36.5% more expensive on MSRP at $2,702 MSRP versus $1,980 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E7540 is also 35.5% better value on MSRP (5.2 vs 3.9 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon D-1567 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon D-1567 vs Xeon E7540 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon D-1567

The Xeon D-1567 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (per core). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 10,447 points. Launch price was $1,069.

Intel

Xeon E7540

The Xeon E7540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.27 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB L3 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1567. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 10,376 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Xeon D-1567 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon E7540 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon D-1567 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Xeon D-1567 versus 2.27 GHz on the Xeon E7540 — a 17.3% clock advantage for the Xeon D-1567 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon D-1567 is built on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon D-1567 scores 10,447 against the Xeon E7540's 10,376 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon D-1567. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (per core) on the Xeon D-1567 vs 18 MB L3 Cache on the Xeon E7540.

FeatureXeon D-1567Xeon E7540
Cores / Threads
12 / 24+100%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz+19%
2.27 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz+5%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
1.5 MB (per core)
18 MB L3 Cache+1100%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
10,447
10,376
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-1567 uses the FCBGA1667 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E7540 uses LGA1567 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon D-1567Xeon E7540
Socket
FCBGA1667
LGA1567
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
2 TB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
32
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon D-1567) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E7540). Primary use case: Xeon E7540 targets Server.

FeatureXeon D-1567Xeon E7540
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon D-1567 was priced at $2702, while the Xeon E7540 came in at $1980. On launch pricing ($2702 vs $1980), Xeon E7540 was $722 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon D-1567 delivers 3.9 pts/$ vs 5.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E7540 — making the Xeon E7540 the 30.2% better value option.

FeatureXeon D-1567Xeon E7540
MSRP
$2702
$1980-27%
Performance per Dollar
3.9
5.2+33%
Release Date
2016
2010

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.