Xeon D-1736NT vs Xeon Gold 6144

Intel

Xeon D-1736NT

8 Cores16 Thrd67 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2022
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6144

8 Cores16 Thrd150 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······

Xeon D-1736NT vs Xeon Gold 6144 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon D-1736NT vs Xeon Gold 6144 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon D-1736NT vs Xeon Gold 6144: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon D-1736NT

2022

Why buy it

  • Draws 67W instead of 150W, a 83W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6144 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (17,826 vs 18,040).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 25 MB).

Xeon Gold 6144

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +22.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +65% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 15 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 123.9% higher power demand at 150W vs 67W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6144 better than Xeon D-1736NT?
Yes. Xeon Gold 6144 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 22.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6144 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 22.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6144 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 65% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 15 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Gold 6144 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Gold 6144 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 22.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon D-1736NT makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon D-1736NT vs Xeon Gold 6144 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon D-1736NT

The Xeon D-1736NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 67 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,826 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6144

The Xeon Gold 6144 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 18,040 points. Launch price was $2,925.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon D-1736NT and Xeon Gold 6144 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1736NT versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6144 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6144 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6144 is built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon D-1736NT scores 17,826 against the Xeon Gold 6144's 18,040 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 6144. L3 cache: 15 MB on the Xeon D-1736NT vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6144.

FeatureXeon D-1736NTXeon Gold 6144
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
4.2 GHz+20%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
3.5 GHz+30%
L3 Cache
15 MB
24.75 MB+65%
L2 Cache
8 MB
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark
17,826
18,040+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-1736NT uses the FCBGA2227 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6144 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon D-1736NTXeon Gold 6144
Socket
FCBGA2227
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0