Xeon D-1736NT vs Xeon Phi 7290

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon D-1736NT vs Xeon Phi 7290 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon D-1736NT vs Xeon Phi 7290: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon D-1736NT

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 67W instead of 245W, a 178W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (17,826 vs 17,839).

Xeon Phi 7290

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌265.7% higher power demand at 245W vs 67W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1736NT better than Xeon Phi 7290?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon D-1736NT is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Phi 7290 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Phi 7290 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 72 cores and 288 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-1736NT still makes the most sense overall. Xeon D-1736NT comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1736NT makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon D-1736NT vs Xeon Phi 7290 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon D-1736NT

The Xeon D-1736NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 67 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,826 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Phi 7290

The Xeon Phi 7290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 72 cores and 288 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 245 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,839 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon D-1736NT packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Phi 7290 offers 72 cores / 288 threads — the Xeon Phi 7290 has 64 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1736NT versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7290 — a 69.2% clock advantage for the Xeon D-1736NT (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Xeon Phi 7290 is built on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon D-1736NT scores 17,826 against the Xeon Phi 7290's 17,839 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Phi 7290. L3 cache: 15 MB on the Xeon D-1736NT vs 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7290.

Feature	Xeon D-1736NT	Xeon Phi 7290
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	72 / 288+800%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+106%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+80%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	15 MB	0 kB (total)
L2 Cache	—	512 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	—	Knights Landing (2016)
PassMark	17,826	17,839

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-1736NT uses the FCBGA2227 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.