Xeon D-2146NT vs Xeon E5-2650L v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon D-2146NT vs Xeon E5-2650L v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon D-2146NT vs Xeon E5-2650L v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon D-2146NT

2018

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2650L v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (11,736 vs 11,865).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 30 MB).
❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.

Xeon E5-2650L v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+172.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 11 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $1,329 MSRP, while Xeon D-2146NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2650L v3 better than Xeon D-2146NT?

Yes. Xeon E5-2650L v3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2650L v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2650L v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 172.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 11 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2650L v3 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2650L v3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,329 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-2146NT makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon D-2146NT vs Xeon E5-2650L v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon D-2146NT

The Xeon D-2146NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2518. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,736 points. Launch price was $641.

Xeon E5-2650L v3

The Xeon E5-2650L v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 11,865 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon D-2146NT packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2650L v3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2650L v3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon D-2146NT versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650L v3 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Xeon D-2146NT (base: 2.3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Xeon D-2146NT uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2650L v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon D-2146NT scores 11,736 against the Xeon E5-2650L v3's 11,865 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2650L v3. L3 cache: 11 MB on the Xeon D-2146NT vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650L v3.

Feature	Xeon D-2146NT	Xeon E5-2650L v3
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	3 GHz+20%	2.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+28%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	11 MB	30 MB (total)+173%
L2 Cache	8 MB	256K (per core)+3100%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	11,736	11,865+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-2146NT uses the FCBGA2518 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2650L v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon D-2146NT	Xeon E5-2650L v3
Socket	FCBGA2518	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity	—	768 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon D-2146NT) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2650L v3). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2650L v3 targets Server Low Power.