
Xeon D-2753NT

Xeon E-2456
Xeon D-2753NT vs Xeon E-2456 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon D-2753NT vs Xeon E-2456 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon D-2753NT vs Xeon E-2456: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon D-2753NT
2022Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2456 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,626 vs 20,705).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA2579 with DDR4, while Xeon E-2456 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Xeon E-2456
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 87W, a 7W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2579 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E-2456 better than Xeon D-2753NT?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon D-2753NT vs Xeon E-2456 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon D-2753NT
The Xeon D-2753NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 87 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,626 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E-2456
The Xeon E-2456 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 20,705 points. Launch price was $375.
Processing Power
The Xeon D-2753NT packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon E-2456 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon D-2753NT has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2753NT versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon E-2456 — a 48.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2456 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Xeon E-2456 is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon D-2753NT scores 20,626 against the Xeon E-2456's 20,705 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E-2456. L3 cache: 20 MB on the Xeon D-2753NT vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2456.
| Feature | Xeon D-2753NT | Xeon E-2456 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz+65% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.3 GHz+65% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB+11% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | — | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 20,626 | 20,705 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon D-2753NT uses the FCBGA2579 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2456 uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon D-2753NT | Xeon E-2456 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2579 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














