Xeon E-2176M vs Xeon E5-4650 v3

Intel

Xeon E-2176M

6 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-4650 v3

12 Cores24 Thrd105 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······

Xeon E-2176M vs Xeon E5-4650 v3 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E-2176M vs Xeon E5-4650 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E-2176M vs Xeon E5-4650 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E-2176M

2018

Why buy it

  • +0.1% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 45W instead of 105W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-4650 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).

Xeon E5-4650 v3

2015

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (10,838 vs 10,848).
  • 133.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2176M better than Xeon E5-4650 v3?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-4650 v3 is ahead with a 4.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2176M pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Xeon E5-4650 v3 also has the bigger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2176M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E-2176M still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E-2176M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E-2176M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E-2176M vs Xeon E5-4650 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon E-2176M

The Xeon E-2176M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,848 points. Launch price was $450.

Intel

Xeon E5-4650 v3

The Xeon E5-4650 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,838 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2176M packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-4650 v3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-4650 v3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Xeon E-2176M versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-4650 v3 — a 44.4% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2176M (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E-2176M uses the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4650 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2176M scores 10,848 against the Xeon E5-4650 v3's 10,838 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E-2176M. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2176M vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4650 v3.

FeatureXeon E-2176MXeon E5-4650 v3
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
12 / 24+100%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+57%
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+29%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
30 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark
10,848
10,838
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2176M uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4650 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E-2176MXeon E5-4650 v3
Socket
BGA1440
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%