Xeon E-2236 vs Xeon E5-2667 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E-2236 vs Xeon E5-2667 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E-2236 vs Xeon E5-2667 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E-2236

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 80W instead of 135W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).

Xeon E5-2667 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (13,776 vs 13,885).
❌68.8% higher power demand at 135W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2236 better than Xeon E5-2667 v4?

Yes. Xeon E-2236 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E-2236 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2236 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2236 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E-2236 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2236 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E-2236 vs Xeon E5-2667 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E-2236

The Xeon E-2236 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 13,885 points. Launch price was $284.

Xeon E5-2667 v4

The Xeon E5-2667 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,776 points. Launch price was $2,057.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2236 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2667 v4 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2667 v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon E-2236 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 v4 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2236 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon E-2236 uses the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2667 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2236 scores 13,885 against the Xeon E5-2667 v4's 13,776 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E-2236. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2236 vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2667 v4.

Feature	Xeon E-2236	Xeon E5-2667 v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+33%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+6%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	25 MB+108%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2 MB+700%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	13,885	13,776

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2236 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2667 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.