Xeon E-2334 vs Xeon E5-1680 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E-2334 vs Xeon E5-1680 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E-2334 vs Xeon E5-1680 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E-2334

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (12,364 vs 12,396).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 25 MB).

Xeon E5-1680 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $1,723 MSRP, while Xeon E-2334 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2334 better than Xeon E5-1680 v2?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E-2334 is ahead with a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1680 v2 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. Xeon E5-1680 v2 also has the bigger cache pool with 212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1680 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 212.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2334 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-1680 v2 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E-2334 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,723 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-1680 v2 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. Xeon E5-1680 v2 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2334 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E-2334 vs Xeon E5-1680 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E-2334

The Xeon E-2334 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 12,364 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-1680 v2

The Xeon E5-1680 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 12,396 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2334 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-1680 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-1680 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon E-2334 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-1680 v2 — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2334 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon E-2334 uses the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-1680 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2334 scores 12,364 against the Xeon E5-1680 v2's 12,396 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-1680 v2. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2334 vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1680 v2.

Feature	Xeon E-2334	Xeon E5-1680 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+23%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+13%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	25 MB (total)+213%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Rocket Lake-E (2021)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	12,364	12,396
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	8,579
Geekbench 6 Single	—	750
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	4,500

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2334 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-1680 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E-2334	Xeon E5-1680 v2
Socket	LGA1200	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	—	256 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E-2334) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E5-1680 v2). Primary use case: Xeon E5-1680 v2 targets Server/Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon E5-1680 v2 rivals Core i7-4960X.