Xeon E-2334 vs Xeon W-10855M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E-2334 vs Xeon W-10855M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E-2334 vs Xeon W-10855M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E-2334

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-10855M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌4233.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 1.5W.

Xeon W-10855M

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (12,249 vs 12,364).
❌Launch MSRP is still $118 MSRP, while Xeon E-2334 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-10855M better than Xeon E-2334?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-10855M is ahead with a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2334 pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark. Xeon W-10855M also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2334 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-10855M is the better buy right now. Xeon W-10855M comes in at an unclear MSRP at $118 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E-2334 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.9% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (103.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2334 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E-2334 vs Xeon W-10855M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E-2334

The Xeon E-2334 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 12,364 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-10855M

The Xeon W-10855M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,249 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2334 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon W-10855M offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon W-10855M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon E-2334 versus 4.9 GHz on the Xeon W-10855M — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Xeon W-10855M (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon E-2334 uses the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-10855M uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2334 scores 12,364 against the Xeon W-10855M's 12,249 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E-2334. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2334 vs 12 MB on the Xeon W-10855M.

Feature	Xeon E-2334	Xeon W-10855M
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz	4.9 GHz+2%
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+21%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	12 MB+50%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+34033%	1.5 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Rocket Lake-E (2021)	Comet Lake-H (2020)
PassMark	12,364	12,249

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2334 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-10855M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.