
Xeon E-2386G
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2690 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon E-2386G
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.8% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 135W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 35 MB).
Xeon E5-2690 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2386G across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,255 vs 19,468).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,090 MSRP, while Xeon E-2386G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌42.1% higher power demand at 135W vs 95W.
Xeon E-2386G
2021Xeon E5-2690 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.8% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 135W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 35 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2386G across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,255 vs 19,468).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,090 MSRP, while Xeon E-2386G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌42.1% higher power demand at 135W vs 95W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E-2386G better than Xeon E5-2690 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon E-2386G | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 260 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon E-2386G | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 364 FPS |
| medium | 423 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 348 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 304 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 380 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 293 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 120 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon E-2386G | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 481 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 487 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 481 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 331 FPS |
| ultra | 320 FPS | 277 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon E-2386G | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 481 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 487 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 481 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 487 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 416 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 358 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E-2386G and Xeon E5-2690 v4

Xeon E-2386G
Xeon E-2386G
The Xeon E-2386G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,468 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-2690 v4
Xeon E5-2690 v4
The Xeon E5-2690 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 19,255 points. Launch price was $2,090.
Processing Power
The Xeon E-2386G packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2690 v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2690 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Xeon E-2386G versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2690 v4 — a 37.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2386G (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon E-2386G uses the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2690 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2386G scores 19,468 against the Xeon E5-2690 v4's 19,255 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E-2386G. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2386G vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2690 v4.
| Feature | Xeon E-2386G | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 14 / 28+133% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+46% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+35% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 35 MB+192% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 3.5 MB+600% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake-E (2021) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 19,468+1% | 19,255 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E-2386G uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2690 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E-2386G | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1536 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













