
Core Ultra 7 268V

Xeon E-2386G
Core Ultra 7 268V vs Xeon E-2386G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 7 268V vs Xeon E-2386G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 7 268V vs Xeon E-2386G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 7 268V
2024Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 95W, a 78W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics 140V, while Xeon E-2386G needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2386G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2386G, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $450 MSRP, while Xeon E-2386G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E-2386G
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,468 vs 19,698).
- ❌458.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 17W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 268V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 268V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 268V better than Xeon E-2386G?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 268V vs Xeon E-2386G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 7 268V
The Core Ultra 7 268V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,698 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E-2386G
The Xeon E-2386G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,468 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 268V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E-2386G offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 7 268V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 268V versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon E-2386G — a 2% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2386G (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 268V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon E-2386G uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 268V scores 19,698 against the Xeon E-2386G's 19,468 — a 1.2% lead for the Core Ultra 7 268V. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 268V | Xeon E-2386G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.1 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz+59% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+20380% |
| Process | 3 nm-79% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Lunar Lake (2024) | Rocket Lake-E (2021) |
| PassMark | 19,698+1% | 19,468 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 10,653 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,437 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 268V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2386G uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 268V | Xeon E-2386G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2833 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-8533 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 268V) / not specified (Xeon E-2386G). The Core Ultra 7 268V includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics 140V), while the Xeon E-2386G requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 268V targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 268V rivals Core Ultra 7 155H.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 268V | Xeon E-2386G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Arc Graphics 140V | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













