Xeon E-2436
VS
M2 Pro

Xeon E-2436 vs M2 Pro

Intel

Xeon E-2436

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 5 GHz2023
VS

M2 Pro

12 Cores12 Thrd36 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E-2436

#143
Xeon W-1350P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $250
102%
#145
Xeon 6511P
MSRP: $815|Avg: $815
101%
#150
Xeon E-2436
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#153
EPYC 7303P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $594
99%
#155
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $999
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar M2 Pro

#204
M2 Pro
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E-2436 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E-2436M2 Pro
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Legacy / 5 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The M2 Pro ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E-2436M2 Pro
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E-2436 and M2 Pro

Intel

Xeon E-2436

The Xeon E-2436 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 21,708 points. Launch price was $331.

M2 Pro

The M2 Pro is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.42 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,939 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2436 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the M2 Pro offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the M2 Pro has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Xeon E-2436 versus 3.5 GHz on the M2 Pro — a 35.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2436 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.42 GHz). The Xeon E-2436 is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E-2436 scores 21,708 against the M2 Pro's 21,939 — a 1.1% lead for the M2 Pro. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2436 vs 24 MB on the M2 Pro.

FeatureXeon E-2436M2 Pro
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
12 / 12+100%
Boost Clock
5 GHz+43%
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+20%
2.42 GHz
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)
24 MB+33%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
36 MB+2780%
Process
Intel 7 nm
5 nm-29%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark
21,708
21,939+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,650
Geekbench 6 Multi
14,450
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2436 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M2 Pro uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E-2436M2 Pro
Socket
LGA1700
none
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E-2436) / ARM Virtualization (M2 Pro). The M2 Pro includes integrated graphics (Apple M2 Pro GPU), while the Xeon E-2436 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M2 Pro targets Professional Laptop.

FeatureXeon E-2436M2 Pro
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Apple M2 Pro GPU
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
ARM Virtualization
Target Use
Professional Laptop