Xeon E-2436 vs Xeon E5-2697A v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E-2436 vs Xeon E5-2697A v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E-2436 vs Xeon E5-2697A v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E-2436

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 145W, a 80W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 40 MB).

Xeon E5-2697A v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+122.2% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 18 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (21,621 vs 21,708).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,891 MSRP, while Xeon E-2436 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌123.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Xeon E-2436 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2436 better than Xeon E5-2697A v4?

Yes. Xeon E-2436 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E-2436 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2436 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2436 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2697A v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E-2436 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,891 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2697A v4 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2436 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 16/32. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon E-2436 vs Xeon E5-2697A v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E-2436

The Xeon E-2436 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 21,708 points. Launch price was $331.

Xeon E5-2697A v4

The Xeon E5-2697A v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 21,621 points. Launch price was $2,891.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2436 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2697A v4 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-2697A v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Xeon E-2436 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697A v4 — a 32.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2436 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon E-2436 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2697A v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2436 scores 21,708 against the Xeon E5-2697A v4's 21,621 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E-2436. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2436 vs 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2697A v4.

Feature	Xeon E-2436	Xeon E5-2697A v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	16 / 32+167%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+39%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+12%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)	40 MB+122%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	4 MB+220%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	21,708	21,621

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2436 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2697A v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.