Xeon E-2488
VS
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

Xeon E-2488 vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

Intel

Xeon E-2488

8 Cores16 Thrd95 WWMax: 5.6 GHz2023
VS
AMD

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

8 Cores16 Thrd55 WWMax: 5 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E-2488

#237
Xeon w3-2535
MSRP: $739|Avg: $800
107%
#239
EPYC 7313P
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
107%
#240
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $60
106%
#241
Xeon w5-2555X
MSRP: $1069|Avg: $1145
106%
#242
Xeon E-2246G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $268
106%
#244
Xeon w3-2423
MSRP: $359|Avg: $300
105%
#245
EPYC 8434P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $3137
104%
#247
EPYC 7443P
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $1045
101%
#248
EPYC 4564P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
101%
#249
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
MSRP: $1340|Avg: $1340
101%
#250
EPYC 7D12
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
101%
#251
Xeon W-1390P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $450
100%
#252
Xeon E-2488
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#253
Xeon W-2150B
MSRP: $499|Avg: $400
98%
#255
Xeon 6517P
MSRP: $1195|Avg: $1195
97%
#257
Xeon W-1290
MSRP: $498|Avg: $300
96%
#258
EPYC 9124
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $1083
96%
#260
EPYC 4584PX
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
94%
#261
Xeon w3-2435
MSRP: $669|Avg: $790
94%
#263
Xeon 6710E
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $344
93%
#264
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $180
93%
#266
EPYC 7C13
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000
91%
#267
Xeon Gold 6336Y
MSRP: $3245|Avg: N/A
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
118%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
116%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
116%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
112%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
110%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
102%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
102%
#189
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E-2488 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E-2488Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E-2488Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E-2488 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

Intel

Xeon E-2488

The Xeon E-2488 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 31,888 points. Launch price was $606.

AMD

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,508 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E-2488 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Xeon E-2488 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 — a 11.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2488 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon E-2488 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2488 scores 31,888 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385's 31,508 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon E-2488. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,000 vs 16,500 (9.5% advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,100 vs 2,886, a 31.5% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,000 vs 14,136 (16.3% advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2488 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385.

FeatureXeon E-2488Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.6 GHz+12%
5 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz+12%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)
32 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark
31,888+1%
31,508
Cinebench R23 Multi
15,000
16,500+10%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,100
2,886+37%
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,000
14,136+18%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2488 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Xeon E-2488) vs 8 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: W680 (Xeon E-2488) and Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385).

FeatureXeon E-2488Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Socket
LGA1700
FP11
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
LPDDR5x-8000
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E-2488) vs AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 8050S), while the Xeon E-2488 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E-2488 targets Entry-level Server / Workstation, Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 targets Enterprise AI Mobile. Direct competitor: Xeon E-2488 rivals Xeon E-2388G; Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 rivals M3 Max.

FeatureXeon E-2488Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 8050S
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Entry-level Server / Workstation
Enterprise AI Mobile