Xeon E3-1220 v5 vs Xeon E5-1410 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E3-1220 v5 vs Xeon E5-1410 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E3-1220 v5 vs Xeon E5-1410 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E3-1220 v5

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1410 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,713 vs 5,715).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $203 MSRP, while Xeon E5-1410 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-1410 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-1410 v2 better than Xeon E3-1220 v5?

Yes. Xeon E5-1410 v2 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 22.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-1410 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 22.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1410 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-1410 v2 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E3-1220 v5 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-1410 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $203 MSRP, and it still gives you a 22.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E3-1220 v5 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (28.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1220 v5 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E3-1220 v5 vs Xeon E5-1410 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E3-1220 v5

The Xeon E3-1220 v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 5,713 points. Launch price was $203.

Xeon E5-1410 v2

The Xeon E5-1410 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 5,715 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E3-1220 v5 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E5-1410 v2's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E3-1220 v5 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-1410 v2 — a 9% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1220 v5 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon E3-1220 v5 uses the Skylake-DT (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-1410 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1220 v5 scores 5,713 against the Xeon E5-1410 v2's 5,715 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E5-1410 v2. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1220 v5 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1410 v2.

Feature	Xeon E3-1220 v5	Xeon E5-1410 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+9%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+7%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	10 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Skylake-DT (2015)	Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)
PassMark	5,713	5,715

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1220 v5 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1410 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.